<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/wp-content/themes/feed/atom.xsl"?>
<feed
        xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
        xmlns:wwe="http://release.wwe.com/atom/1.0"
        xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0"
        xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
        xml:lang="en-US"
        xml:base="https://www.zambranolaw.com/wp-atom.php"
	>
    <title type="text">Zambrano Law</title>
    <subtitle type="text">Zambrano Law</subtitle>

    <updated>2026-06-17T16:22:17Z</updated>

    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.zambranolaw.com" />
    <id>https://www.zambranolaw.com/feed/atom/</id>
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.zambranolaw.com/feed/atom/?forceByPassCache=0.5650334544834971" />
	
	<generator uri="https://wordpress.org/" version="6.9.4">WordPress</generator>
<icon>/wp-content/uploads/sites/1605175/2025/08/cropped-Fav-icon-32x32.png</icon>
        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>by Shirley  Zambrano</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Tribunal Federal Anula Políticas de USCIS que Suspendían la Adjudicación de Beneficios Migratorios: Lo Que Esto Significa para los Inmigrantes]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.zambranolaw.com/blog/2026/06/tribunal-federal-anula-politicas-de-uscis-que-suspendian-la-adjudicacion-de-beneficios-migratorios-lo-que-esto-significa-para-los-inmigrantes/" />
            <id>https://www.zambranolaw.com/?p=51758</id>
            <updated>2026-06-05T18:51:21Z</updated>
            <published>2026-06-05T18:51:02Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[El 5 de junio de 2026, un juez federal en Rhode Island emitió una decisión importante que podría afectar a miles de inmigrantes cuyas solicitudes han sido retrasadas o puestas en pausa por el Servicio de Ciudadanía e Inmigración de los Estados Unidos (USCIS). En el caso Dorcas International Institute of Rhode Island v. USCIS, el tribunal determinó que varias políticas…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.zambranolaw.com/blog/2026/06/tribunal-federal-anula-politicas-de-uscis-que-suspendian-la-adjudicacion-de-beneficios-migratorios-lo-que-esto-significa-para-los-inmigrantes/"><![CDATA[El 5 de junio de 2026, un juez federal en Rhode Island emitió una decisión importante que podría afectar a miles de inmigrantes cuyas solicitudes han sido retrasadas o puestas en pausa por el Servicio de Ciudadanía e Inmigración de los Estados Unidos (USCIS).

En el caso <i>Dorcas International Institute of Rhode Island v. USCIS</i>, el tribunal determinó que varias políticas de USCIS que suspendían o retrasaban la adjudicación de beneficios migratorios eran ilegales y debían ser anuladas.
<h2>¿Qué Políticas Fueron Anuladas?</h2>
El tribunal invalidó varias políticas de USCIS, incluyendo:
<ul>
 	<li>La Política Global de Suspensión de Casos de Asilo.</li>
 	<li>La Política de Suspensión de Beneficios.</li>
 	<li>La Política de Revisión Integral de Casos.</li>
 	<li>La Política de Factores Específicos por País.</li>
</ul>
Estas políticas habían provocado la suspensión, retraso o revisión adicional de numerosas solicitudes migratorias presentadas por personas provenientes de ciertos países designados.
<h2>¿Quiénes Fueron Afectados?</h2>
Las políticas impugnadas afectaron a solicitantes de 39 países, incluyendo Venezuela, Cuba, Haití, Afganistán, China, Rusia, Irán, Siria, Nicaragua y muchos otros.

Como resultado, muchos inmigrantes experimentaron retrasos significativos en la adjudicación de solicitudes como:
<ul>
 	<li>Ajuste de Estatus (Residencia Permanente)</li>
 	<li>Permisos de Trabajo</li>
 	<li>Solicitudes de Naturalización</li>
 	<li>Beneficios Relacionados con Asilo</li>
 	<li>Beneficios Migratorios Basados en Familia</li>
 	<li>Beneficios Migratorios Basados en Empleo</li>
 	<li>Solicitudes Humanitarias</li>
</ul>
Para muchos solicitantes, sus casos permanecieron pendientes durante meses sin avances significativos mientras USCIS realizaba revisiones adicionales bajo estas políticas.
<h2>¿Qué Significa Esta Decisión?</h2>
El tribunal concluyó que USCIS carecía de autoridad legal para implementar suspensiones generales en la adjudicación de beneficios migratorios y que no cumplió con los procedimientos requeridos por la Ley de Procedimiento Administrativo (Administrative Procedure Act o APA).

Si esta decisión permanece vigente, USCIS podría verse obligado a reanudar el procesamiento de solicitudes que anteriormente fueron retrasadas bajo estas políticas.

Esto podría resultar en avances para muchos casos que han permanecido estancados durante meses debido a los procedimientos internos de revisión de la agencia.
<h2>¿Qué Deben Hacer los Solicitantes Ahora?</h2>
Las personas con solicitudes migratorias pendientes deberían:
<ul>
 	<li>Monitorear regularmente el estatus de su caso.</li>
 	<li>Asegurarse de que USCIS tenga su dirección actualizada.</li>
 	<li>Responder oportunamente a cualquier Solicitud de Evidencia (RFE).</li>
 	<li>Consultar con un abogado de inmigración con experiencia para analizar cómo esta decisión podría afectar su caso específico.</li>
</ul>
Aquellos cuyos casos han experimentado retrasos inusuales también podrían beneficiarse de una evaluación legal sobre las opciones disponibles.
<h2>¿Qué Sucede Ahora?</h2>
Se espera que el gobierno federal considere apelar esta decisión. Además, podría solicitar una suspensión temporal de la orden mientras la apelación esté pendiente.

Por lo tanto, aunque esta decisión es extremadamente significativa, el panorama legal podría continuar evolucionando durante las próximas semanas y meses.
<h2>¿Cómo Puede Ayudar Zambrano Law?</h2>
Si su solicitud de inmigración ha sido retrasada, puesta en pausa o ha permanecido pendiente durante un período prolongado, nuestro equipo puede evaluar su caso y determinar si esta decisión judicial podría beneficiarle.

Continuamos monitoreando de cerca los acontecimientos y proporcionando actualizaciones conforme surja nueva información.

Para programar una consulta con Zambrano Law, comuníquese con nuestra oficina al [nap_phone id="LOCAL-CT-NUMBER-1"].

<em><b>Aviso Legal</b></em>

<em><b>Este artículo se proporciona únicamente con fines informativos y refleja el estado de la ley al 5 de junio de 2026. Las leyes de inmigración, regulaciones, políticas gubernamentales y decisiones judiciales pueden cambiar rápidamente. Esta decisión puede estar sujeta a apelaciones, suspensiones, litigios adicionales, nuevas órdenes judiciales o futuras directrices gubernamentales que podrían modificar su impacto. Nada de lo contenido en este artículo constituye asesoría legal, y los lectores deben consultar con un abogado calificado sobre sus circunstancias particulares.</b></em>]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>by Shirley  Zambrano</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Federal Court Strikes Down USCIS Adjudication Hold Policies: What This Means for Immigrants]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.zambranolaw.com/blog/2026/06/federal-court-strikes-down-uscis-adjudication-hold-policies-what-this-means-for-immigrants/" />
            <id>https://www.zambranolaw.com/?p=51757</id>
            <updated>2026-06-05T18:50:50Z</updated>
            <published>2026-06-05T18:50:50Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[On June 5, 2026, a federal judge in Rhode Island issued a significant decision that may impact thousands of immigrants whose applications have been delayed or placed on hold by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). In the case of Dorcas International Institute of Rhode Island v. USCIS, the court ruled that several USCIS policies that paused or delayed the adjudication…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.zambranolaw.com/blog/2026/06/federal-court-strikes-down-uscis-adjudication-hold-policies-what-this-means-for-immigrants/"><![CDATA[On June 5, 2026, a federal judge in Rhode Island issued a significant decision that may impact thousands of immigrants whose applications have been delayed or placed on hold by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS).

In the case of <i>Dorcas International Institute of Rhode Island v. USCIS</i>, the court ruled that several USCIS policies that paused or delayed the adjudication of immigration benefits were unlawful and must be vacated.
<h2>What Policies Were Struck Down?</h2>
The court invalidated several USCIS policies, including:
<ul>
 	<li>The Global Asylum Hold Policy</li>
 	<li>The Benefits Hold Policy</li>
 	<li>The Comprehensive Re-Review Policy</li>
 	<li>The Country-Specific Factors Policy</li>
</ul>
These policies had resulted in the suspension, delay, or additional review of many immigration applications filed by individuals from certain designated countries.
<h2>Who Was Affected?</h2>
The challenged policies impacted applicants from 39 countries, including Venezuela, Cuba, Haiti, Afghanistan, China, Russia, Iran, Syria, Nicaragua, and many others.

As a result, many immigrants experienced lengthy delays in the adjudication of applications such as:
<ul>
 	<li>Adjustment of Status (Green Card Applications)</li>
 	<li>Employment Authorization Documents (Work Permits)</li>
 	<li>Naturalization Applications</li>
 	<li>Asylum-Related Benefits</li>
 	<li>Family-Based Immigration Benefits</li>
 	<li>Employment-Based Immigration Benefits</li>
 	<li>Humanitarian Applications</li>
</ul>
For many applicants, cases remained pending for months without meaningful movement while USCIS conducted additional reviews under these policies.
<h2>What Does This Decision Mean?</h2>
The court concluded that USCIS lacked legal authority to implement broad adjudication holds and failed to comply with required procedures under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).

If the decision remains in effect, USCIS may be required to resume processing applications that were previously delayed under these policies.

This could result in movement on many long-pending cases that have been stalled due to the agency’s internal review procedures.
<h2>What Should Applicants Do Now?</h2>
Individuals with pending immigration applications should:
<ul>
 	<li>Monitor their case status closely.</li>
 	<li>Keep their address updated with USCIS.</li>
 	<li>Respond promptly to any Requests for Evidence (RFEs).</li>
 	<li>Consult with an experienced immigration attorney regarding the impact of this decision on their specific case.</li>
</ul>
Applicants whose cases have experienced unusual delays may also wish to discuss possible legal options with counsel.
<h2>What Happens Next?</h2>
The federal government is expected to consider an appeal of this decision. The government may also seek a stay of the court’s order while the appeal is pending.

As a result, although this ruling is extremely significant, the legal landscape may continue to evolve in the coming weeks and months.
<h2>How Zambrano Law Can Help</h2>
If your immigration application has been delayed, placed on hold, or has remained pending for an extended period of time, our team can evaluate your case and determine whether this court decision may affect you.

We continue to monitor developments closely and will provide updates as additional information becomes available.

To schedule a consultation with Zambrano Law, contact our office today at [nap_phone id="LOCAL-CT-NUMBER-1"].

<em><b>Disclaimer</b></em>

<em><b>This article is provided for informational purposes only and reflects the status of the law as of June 5, 2026. Immigration laws, regulations, agency policies, and court decisions can change rapidly. This ruling may be subject to appeals, stays, further litigation, additional court orders, or subsequent agency guidance that could alter its impact. Nothing in this article constitutes legal advice, and readers should consult with qualified legal counsel regarding their individual circumstances.</b></em>]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>On Behalf of Zambrano Law</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[USCIS Emite Nuevo Memorándum Sobre Ajuste de Estatus: Lo Que Deben Saber los Solicitantes de la Residencia Permanente]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.zambranolaw.com/blog/2026/06/uscis-emite-nuevo-memorandum-sobre-ajuste-de-estatus-lo-que-deben-saber-los-solicitantes-de-la-residencia-permanente/" />
            <id>https://www.zambranolaw.com/?p=51750</id>
            <updated>2026-05-28T21:17:48Z</updated>
            <published>2026-06-01T14:00:48Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[El 21 de mayo de 2026, el Servicio de Ciudadanía e Inmigración de los Estados Unidos (USCIS) emitió un nuevo memorándum que ha generado preocupación dentro de la comunidad inmigrante. El documento enfatiza que el Ajuste de Estatus, es decir, el proceso para obtener la residencia permanente (“Green Card”) dentro de los Estados Unidos, es un beneficio discrecional y no…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.zambranolaw.com/blog/2026/06/uscis-emite-nuevo-memorandum-sobre-ajuste-de-estatus-lo-que-deben-saber-los-solicitantes-de-la-residencia-permanente/"><![CDATA[<p style="font-weight: 400;">El 21 de mayo de 2026, el Servicio de Ciudadanía e Inmigración de los Estados Unidos (USCIS) emitió un nuevo memorándum que ha generado preocupación dentro de la comunidad inmigrante. El documento enfatiza que el Ajuste de Estatus, es decir, el proceso para obtener la residencia permanente ("Green Card") dentro de los Estados Unidos, es un beneficio discrecional y no un derecho automático.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Aunque muchas personas han interpretado este memorándum como el fin del Ajuste de Estatus, eso simplemente no es cierto.</p>

<h2 style="font-weight: 400;">El Ajuste de Estatus Sigue Existiendo</h2>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Lo primero que debe saber es que el Ajuste de Estatus NO ha sido eliminado.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">La ley federal sigue permitiendo que muchas personas elegibles soliciten la residencia permanente desde dentro de los Estados Unidos. USCIS continúa aceptando y aprobando solicitudes de Ajuste de Estatus todos los días.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">El memorándum no cambia la ley. Lo que hace es recordar a los oficiales de inmigración que deben analizar cuidadosamente si un solicitante merece una aprobación favorable como cuestión de discreción.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">En otras palabras, cumplir con los requisitos básicos de elegibilidad puede no ser suficiente. USCIS ahora está enfatizando la importancia de demostrar por qué el solicitante merece recibir la residencia permanente.</p>

<h2 style="font-weight: 400;">¿Qué Está Diciendo USCIS?</h2>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">En el memorándum, USCIS describe el Ajuste de Estatus como una forma "extraordinaria" de alivio migratorio porque permite que ciertas personas obtengan la residencia permanente sin tener que salir del país y completar el proceso consular en el extranjero.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">USCIS recuerda a sus oficiales que el Ajuste de Estatus es una cuestión de discreción administrativa y que deben evaluar cuidadosamente todos los factores positivos y negativos antes de aprobar una solicitud.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Además, el memorándum señala que los oficiales deben determinar si otorgar la residencia permanente es consistente con los mejores intereses de los Estados Unidos.</p>

<h2 style="font-weight: 400;">¿Qué Factores Podría Considerar USCIS?</h2>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Bajo esta nueva guía, los oficiales pueden examinar una amplia variedad de factores al decidir si aprueban o no una solicitud de residencia permanente.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Entre ellos se encuentran:</p>

<ul style="font-weight: 400;">
 	<li>Historial de empleo y estabilidad laboral.</li>
 	<li>Declaración y pago de impuestos.</li>
 	<li>Cumplimiento con obligaciones de manutención de hijos (child support).</li>
 	<li>Lazos familiares en los Estados Unidos.</li>
 	<li>Participación en actividades comunitarias o voluntariado.</li>
 	<li>Buen carácter moral.</li>
 	<li>Historial criminal, incluyendo arrestos, citaciones y condenas.</li>
 	<li>Historial migratorio.</li>
 	<li>Cumplimiento con los términos de visas, permisos o parole.</li>
 	<li>Fraude, tergiversaciones o declaraciones falsas realizadas en el pasado.</li>
</ul>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">USCIS ha dejado claro que los oficiales deben evaluar el expediente completo y tomar una decisión basada en la totalidad de las circunstancias.</p>

<h2 style="font-weight: 400;">¿Qué Significa Esto Para Los Solicitantes?</h2>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Este memorándum envía un mensaje claro: USCIS realizará un análisis más profundo de muchos casos de Ajuste de Estatus.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Es posible que veamos un aumento en:</p>

<ul style="font-weight: 400;">
 	<li>Solicitudes de Evidencia (RFEs).</li>
 	<li>Notificaciones de Intención de Denegar (NOIDs).</li>
 	<li>Entrevistas más detalladas.</li>
 	<li>Preguntas relacionadas con impuestos, empleo, historial migratorio y antecedentes personales.</li>
</ul>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Por esta razón, es más importante que nunca preparar una solicitud sólida y bien documentada.</p>

<h2 style="font-weight: 400;">Ahora Más Que Nunca, No Haga El Proceso Solo</h2>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Muchas personas intentan presentar sus solicitudes por cuenta propia basándose en información obtenida en redes sociales, grupos de internet, amigos o notarios.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Sin embargo, cada caso es diferente.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Un caso que parece sencillo puede contener problemas relacionados con entradas al país, presencia ilegal, antecedentes penales, errores en solicitudes anteriores o situaciones familiares que podrían afectar seriamente el resultado de la solicitud.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Bajo esta nueva política, los solicitantes deben estar preparados para demostrar no solamente que califican para la residencia, sino también por qué merecen una decisión favorable.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">La presentación adecuada de evidencia positiva puede marcar una diferencia significativa en el resultado de un caso.</p>

<h2 style="font-weight: 400;">¿Cómo Puede Ayudar Un Abogado De Inmigración?</h2>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Un abogado de inmigración con experiencia puede identificar problemas antes de que se conviertan en obstáculos, ayudar a reunir evidencia favorable, preparar una estrategia sólida y presentar el caso de la manera más efectiva posible.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Esperar hasta recibir una Solicitud de Evidencia o una Intención de Denegar puede ser demasiado tarde.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Los casos más exitosos suelen ser aquellos que se preparan correctamente desde el principio.</p>

<h3 style="font-weight: 400;">Contacte a Zambrano Law</h3>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Si está considerando solicitar la residencia permanente mediante Ajuste de Estatus, ya presentó su solicitud o tiene preguntas sobre cómo este nuevo memorándum podría afectar su caso, comuníquese con Zambrano Law.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Nuestra firma monitorea constantemente los cambios en las leyes y políticas migratorias para ayudar a nuestros clientes a navegar exitosamente el proceso migratorio.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Llame hoy mismo al 770-769-5821 para programar una consulta.</p>

<h2 style="font-weight: 400;">Preguntas Frecuentes</h2>
<h3 style="font-weight: 400;">¿USCIS eliminó el Ajuste de Estatus?</h3>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">No. El Ajuste de Estatus continúa disponible para las personas que califican bajo la ley.</p>

<h3 style="font-weight: 400;">¿Este memorándum cambia la ley?</h3>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">No. El memorándum no modifica la ley. Sin embargo, enfatiza la discreción que USCIS tiene para aprobar o negar muchas solicitudes de Ajuste de Estatus.</p>

<h3 style="font-weight: 400;">¿USCIS puede revisar mis impuestos y empleo?</h3>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Sí. El memorándum indica que los oficiales pueden considerar factores como historial laboral, cumplimiento tributario, carácter moral, historial migratorio y otros factores positivos o negativos.</p>

<h3 style="font-weight: 400;">¿Debo presentar mi caso sin abogado?</h3>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Debido al mayor énfasis en la discreción y en la evaluación de factores positivos y negativos, es recomendable consultar con un abogado de inmigración antes de presentar una solicitud de residencia permanente.</p>

<h3 style="font-weight: 400;">¿Necesita ayuda con su solicitud de residencia?</h3>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Llame a Zambrano Law al [nap_phone id="LOCAL-CT-NUMBER-1"] y permita que nuestro equipo evalúe su caso y le ayude a preparar la solicitud más sólida posible.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Basado en el Memorándum de Política USCIS PM-602-0199 del 21 de mayo de 2026.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;"></p>]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>On Behalf of Zambrano Law</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[USCIS Issues New Adjustment of Status Policy Memo: What Green Card Applicants Need to Know]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.zambranolaw.com/blog/2026/06/uscis-issues-new-adjustment-of-status-policy-memo-what-green-card-applicants-need-to-know/" />
            <id>https://www.zambranolaw.com/?p=51749</id>
            <updated>2026-05-28T21:17:14Z</updated>
            <published>2026-06-01T14:00:38Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[On May 21, 2026, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) issued a new policy memorandum emphasizing that Adjustment of Status—the process of obtaining a green card from within the United States—is a discretionary benefit and not an automatic right. While the memo has generated concern among many immigrants and their families, it is important to understand what this policy does…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.zambranolaw.com/blog/2026/06/uscis-issues-new-adjustment-of-status-policy-memo-what-green-card-applicants-need-to-know/"><![CDATA[<p style="font-weight: 400;">On May 21, 2026, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) issued a new policy memorandum emphasizing that Adjustment of Status—the process of obtaining a green card from within the United States—is a discretionary benefit and not an automatic right. While the memo has generated concern among many immigrants and their families, it is important to understand what this policy does and does not mean.</p>

<h2 style="font-weight: 400;">Adjustment of Status Is Still Available</h2>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Despite rumors circulating on social media, Adjustment of Status has not been eliminated.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) still allows many eligible individuals to apply for lawful permanent residence from within the United States. USCIS continues to accept and approve green card applications through Adjustment of Status every day.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">However, the new memorandum makes clear that USCIS officers are expected to place greater emphasis on discretionary factors when deciding whether an applicant deserves approval.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">In other words, meeting the basic legal requirements for a green card may not always be enough. USCIS officers are being reminded to evaluate the entire person and determine whether granting permanent residence is warranted under the totality of the circumstances.</p>

<h2 style="font-weight: 400;">What Is USCIS Saying?</h2>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">The memorandum repeatedly states that Adjustment of Status is an "extraordinary" form of relief that allows certain applicants to obtain permanent residence without having to leave the United States and complete the traditional consular processing procedure abroad.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">USCIS emphasizes that Adjustment of Status is a matter of discretion and administrative grace. As a result, immigration officers are instructed to carefully weigh both favorable and unfavorable factors before approving an application.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">The agency also reminds officers that they must determine whether approval of the application is in the best interests of the United States.</p>

<h2 style="font-weight: 400;">What Factors May USCIS Consider?</h2>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Under the new guidance, USCIS officers may evaluate a variety of factors when deciding whether to exercise discretion favorably.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">These factors may include:</p>

<ul style="font-weight: 400;">
 	<li>Employment history and work stability</li>
 	<li>Filing and payment of taxes</li>
 	<li>Compliance with child support obligations</li>
 	<li>Family ties in the United States</li>
 	<li>Community involvement and volunteer work</li>
 	<li>Evidence of good moral character</li>
 	<li>Criminal history, including arrests, citations, and convictions</li>
 	<li>Prior immigration violations</li>
 	<li>Compliance with the terms of a visa, parole, or other immigration status</li>
 	<li>Prior findings of fraud, misrepresentation, or false statements</li>
</ul>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">USCIS officers are instructed to review all available evidence and consider both positive and negative factors before making a final decision.</p>

<h2 style="font-weight: 400;">Why This Matters for Green Card Applicants</h2>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Many applicants assume that if they are married to a U.S. citizen or otherwise qualify for a green card, approval is guaranteed.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">That has never been entirely true.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">What this memorandum signals is that USCIS may conduct a more thorough discretionary review of Adjustment of Status applications than in the past.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Applicants may begin receiving more Requests for Evidence (RFEs), Notices of Intent to Deny (NOIDs), and additional questioning during interviews regarding their background, employment history, tax compliance, and overall character.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">This means that preparing a strong application is more important than ever.</p>

<h2 style="font-weight: 400;">Do Not Assume You Can Handle Your Case Alone</h2>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">One of the biggest mistakes we see is individuals attempting to navigate the immigration process on their own.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Many people rely on information from social media, friends, family members, online forums, or notarios. Unfortunately, every immigration case is unique, and advice that works for one person may be completely wrong for another.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">A seemingly simple Adjustment of Status case may involve issues related to unlawful presence, prior immigration violations, criminal history, prior entries into the United States, or other factors that could significantly affect the outcome of the case.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Under this new policy guidance, properly documenting positive factors and addressing potential concerns before filing may make a significant difference.</p>

<h2 style="font-weight: 400;">How an Immigration Attorney Can Help</h2>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">An experienced immigration attorney can help identify potential issues before they become problems, gather evidence supporting a favorable exercise of discretion, prepare a comprehensive application package, and ensure that your case is presented in the strongest possible light.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">In today's immigration environment, waiting until USCIS issues a Request for Evidence or Notice of Intent to Deny may be too late.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">The strongest cases are often the ones that are properly prepared from the beginning.</p>

<h3 style="font-weight: 400;">Contact Zambrano Law</h3>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">If you are considering applying for a green card through Adjustment of Status, have already filed an application, or have questions about how this new USCIS policy may affect your case, contact Zambrano Law today.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Our team closely monitors changes in immigration law and policy and is committed to helping immigrants and their families navigate the green card process successfully.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Call Zambrano Law today at 770-769-5820 to schedule a consultation.</p>

<h2 style="font-weight: 400;"><strong>Frequently Asked Questions</strong></h2>
<h3 style="font-weight: 400;">Did USCIS eliminate Adjustment of Status?</h3>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">No. Adjustment of Status remains available for eligible applicants under the Immigration and Nationality Act.</p>

<h3 style="font-weight: 400;">Does this memo create a new law?</h3>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">No. The memorandum does not change the law. Instead, it emphasizes USCIS's existing authority to approve or deny many Adjustment of Status applications as a matter of discretion.</p>

<h3 style="font-weight: 400;">Can USCIS consider my taxes and employment history?</h3>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Yes. The memorandum specifically encourages officers to consider factors such as employment history, tax compliance, moral character, immigration history, and other positive or negative equities.</p>

<h3 style="font-weight: 400;">Should I file my Adjustment of Status application without an attorney?</h3>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Given the increased focus on discretionary factors, applicants should strongly consider consulting with an experienced immigration attorney before filing to ensure their case is properly prepared and documented.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;"><strong>Need help with your green card application? Call Zambrano Law today at [nap_phone id="LOCAL-CT-NUMBER-1"].</strong></p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">This article is based on the USCIS Policy Memorandum PM-602-0199 issued on May 21, 2026.</p>]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>On Behalf of Zambrano Law</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Tribunal Federal Certifica Demanda Colectiva Nacional para Proteger a Solicitantes de Visa U, Visa T y VAWA Contra Detención y Deportación por ICE]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.zambranolaw.com/blog/2026/05/tribunal-federal-certifica-demanda-colectiva-nacional-para-proteger-a-solicitantes-de-visa-u-visa-t-y-vawa-contra-detencion-y-deportacion-por-ice/" />
            <id>https://www.zambranolaw.com/?p=51748</id>
            <updated>2026-05-28T20:09:46Z</updated>
            <published>2026-05-28T20:09:46Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Una reciente decisión de un tribunal federal representa una importante victoria para miles de inmigrantes que tienen solicitudes pendientes de Visa U, Visa T o peticiones VAWA y que enfrentan detención o deportación por parte de Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). El 20 de mayo de 2026, un juez federal del Distrito Central de California certificó varias clases nacionales y…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.zambranolaw.com/blog/2026/05/tribunal-federal-certifica-demanda-colectiva-nacional-para-proteger-a-solicitantes-de-visa-u-visa-t-y-vawa-contra-detencion-y-deportacion-por-ice/"><![CDATA[<p style="font-weight: 400;">Una reciente decisión de un tribunal federal representa una importante victoria para miles de inmigrantes que tienen solicitudes pendientes de Visa U, Visa T o peticiones VAWA y que enfrentan detención o deportación por parte de Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">El 20 de mayo de 2026, un juez federal del Distrito Central de California certificó varias clases nacionales y otorgó medidas cautelares significativas contra el Departamento de Seguridad Nacional (DHS), ICE y el Servicio de Ciudadanía e Inmigración de los Estados Unidos (USCIS). La demanda desafía una política implementada por ICE en enero de 2025 que cambió drásticamente la manera en que el gobierno trata a víctimas de delitos, violencia doméstica y trata de personas que tienen beneficios migratorios pendientes.</p>

<h2 style="font-weight: 400;">¿Qué Cambió en 2025?</h2>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Durante años, ICE generalmente evitó detener o deportar a personas con solicitudes pendientes de Visa U, Visa T o VAWA mientras USCIS evaluaba sus casos. Estas protecciones fueron creadas por el Congreso para incentivar que las víctimas denunciaran delitos, cooperaran con las autoridades y buscaran protección sin temor a ser deportadas.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Sin embargo, en enero de 2025, ICE adoptó una nueva política que permitió a los oficiales iniciar acciones de inmigración contra muchas de estas personas, incluso cuando tenían solicitudes pendientes o habían recibido acción diferida por parte de USCIS.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Organizaciones defensoras de inmigrantes presentaron una demanda argumentando que esta política violaba la ley federal y eliminaba protecciones que el Congreso había otorgado expresamente a las víctimas.</p>

<h2 style="font-weight: 400;">¿Qué Decidió el Tribunal?</h2>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">El tribunal federal certificó clases nacionales que incluyen:</p>

<ul style="font-weight: 400;">
 	<li>Personas con solicitudes pendientes de Visa U.</li>
 	<li>Personas con solicitudes pendientes de Visa T.</li>
 	<li>Personas con peticiones VAWA pendientes.</li>
 	<li>Personas que recibieron acción diferida basada en una Visa U o Visa T pendiente.</li>
 	<li>Personas que solicitaron una suspensión de deportación mientras sus casos de Visa U o Visa T estaban pendientes.</li>
</ul>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">El tribunal concluyó que los demandantes probablemente tendrán éxito en varias de sus reclamaciones y ordenó medidas preliminares para limitar la aplicación de ciertas políticas de ICE mientras el litigio continúa.</p>

<h2 style="font-weight: 400;">¿Por Qué Es Importante Esta Decisión?</h2>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">La decisión reconoce que los solicitantes de beneficios migratorios para víctimas tienen importantes protecciones legales.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">El tribunal expresó preocupación por situaciones en las que ICE:</p>

<ul style="font-weight: 400;">
 	<li>Detuvo personas que ya habían recibido acción diferida por parte de USCIS.</li>
 	<li>Deportó personas sin obtener primero las determinaciones requeridas sobre sus solicitudes pendientes.</li>
 	<li>No proporcionó aviso ni una oportunidad para impugnar la pérdida de beneficios migratorios.</li>
</ul>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Esta decisión fortalece los argumentos legales disponibles para inmigrantes con casos pendientes de Visa U, Visa T o VAWA que enfrentan procesos de detención o deportación.</p>

<h2 style="font-weight: 400;">¿Quién Podría Beneficiarse de Esta Decisión?</h2>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Usted podría estar protegido por esta demanda colectiva si:</p>

<ul style="font-weight: 400;">
 	<li>Tiene una solicitud pendiente de Visa U.</li>
 	<li>Tiene una solicitud pendiente de Visa T.</li>
 	<li>Tiene una petición VAWA pendiente.</li>
 	<li>Recibió acción diferida basada en una Visa U o Visa T pendiente.</li>
 	<li>Actualmente se encuentra detenido por ICE.</li>
 	<li>Tiene una orden final de deportación pero ha solicitado una suspensión de deportación basada en una Visa U o Visa T pendiente.</li>
</ul>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Cada caso es diferente y requiere un análisis individual por parte de un abogado de inmigración con experiencia.</p>

<h2 style="font-weight: 400;">¿Qué Debe Hacer Si Está Detenido o Enfrenta Deportación?</h2>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Si usted o un ser querido tiene una Visa U, Visa T o petición VAWA pendiente y actualmente enfrenta detención o deportación, es fundamental buscar asesoría legal de inmediato.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Estos casos pueden requerir acciones urgentes, incluyendo:</p>

<ul style="font-weight: 400;">
 	<li>Solicitudes de libertad bajo fianza.</li>
 	<li>Mociones ante la Corte de Inmigración.</li>
 	<li>Solicitudes de suspensión de deportación.</li>
 	<li>Litigios federales de habeas corpus.</li>
 	<li>Negociaciones con ICE y DHS.</li>
</ul>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Actuar rápidamente puede marcar la diferencia entre permanecer con su familia en los Estados Unidos o ser deportado.</p>

<h3 style="font-weight: 400;">Llame Hoy a Zambrano Law</h3>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">En Zambrano Law luchamos todos los días por inmigrantes detenidos, personas en procesos de deportación y víctimas que buscan protección mediante Visas U, Visas T y peticiones VAWA.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Nuestra firma cuenta con amplia experiencia en defensa contra la deportación, audiencias de fianza, litigios federales y casos complejos de inmigración en todo el país.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Si usted o un familiar tiene una Visa U, Visa T o petición VAWA pendiente y enfrenta problemas con ICE, no espere para buscar ayuda.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;"> Llame hoy mismo al [nap_phone id="LOCAL-CT-NUMBER-1"]</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;"> Zambrano Law
1995 N Park Place, Suite 360
Atlanta, GA 30339</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Su futuro en los Estados Unidos puede depender de actuar a tiempo. Permítanos evaluar su caso y luchar por usted y su familia.</p>]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>by Shirley  Zambrano</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Federal Court Certifies Nationwide Class Action Protecting U Visa, T Visa, and VAWA Applicants from ICE Detention and Removal]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.zambranolaw.com/blog/2026/05/federal-court-certifies-nationwide-class-action-protecting-u-visa-t-visa-and-vawa-applicants-from-ice-detention-and-removal/" />
            <id>https://www.zambranolaw.com/?p=51747</id>
            <updated>2026-05-28T20:09:35Z</updated>
            <published>2026-05-28T20:09:35Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[A recent federal court decision has provided important protections for immigrants with pending U visa petitions, T visa petitions, and VAWA self-petitions who are facing detention or removal by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). In a landmark decision issued on May 20, 2026, the United States District Court for the Central District of California certified several nationwide classes and granted…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.zambranolaw.com/blog/2026/05/federal-court-certifies-nationwide-class-action-protecting-u-visa-t-visa-and-vawa-applicants-from-ice-detention-and-removal/"><![CDATA[<p style="font-weight: 400;">A recent federal court decision has provided important protections for immigrants with pending U visa petitions, T visa petitions, and VAWA self-petitions who are facing detention or removal by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">In a landmark decision issued on May 20, 2026, the United States District Court for the Central District of California certified several nationwide classes and granted significant preliminary relief against the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), ICE, and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). The lawsuit challenges a January 2025 ICE policy that dramatically changed how the government treats victims of crime, domestic violence, and human trafficking who have pending immigration benefits.</p>

<h2 style="font-weight: 400;">What Changed in 2025?</h2>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">For many years, ICE generally refrained from detaining or removing individuals with pending U visa, T visa, and VAWA applications while USCIS reviewed their cases. These protections were designed to encourage victims of crime and abuse to come forward, cooperate with law enforcement, and seek protection without fear of deportation.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">In January 2025, ICE adopted a new policy that allowed officers to pursue immigration enforcement against many of these individuals despite their pending applications and, in some cases, despite USCIS grants of deferred action.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Immigrant advocates challenged the policy in federal court, arguing that it violated federal law and stripped applicants of protections that Congress intended them to receive.</p>

<h2 style="font-weight: 400;">What Did the Court Decide?</h2>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">The federal court certified nationwide classes that include:</p>

<ul style="font-weight: 400;">
 	<li>Individuals with pending U visa petitions;</li>
 	<li>Individuals with pending T visa petitions;</li>
 	<li>Individuals with pending VAWA self-petitions;</li>
 	<li>Individuals who were granted deferred action based on pending U or T visa petitions;</li>
 	<li>Individuals who requested stays of removal while pursuing U or T visa relief.</li>
</ul>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">The court found that the plaintiffs were likely to succeed on several important claims and entered preliminary relief preventing ICE from enforcing portions of the challenged policies while the case continues.</p>

<h2 style="font-weight: 400;">Why Is This Decision Important?</h2>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">The decision recognizes that applicants for victim-based immigration benefits are entitled to important statutory protections.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">The court specifically expressed concern about situations where ICE:</p>

<ul style="font-weight: 400;">
 	<li>Detained individuals who had already been granted deferred action by USCIS;</li>
 	<li>Removed individuals without first obtaining required determinations regarding their pending petitions;</li>
 	<li>Failed to provide notice and an opportunity to challenge the loss of immigration protections.</li>
</ul>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">The ruling provides strong legal support for immigrants who have pending U visa, T visa, or VAWA cases and who are facing detention or removal proceedings.</p>

<h2 style="font-weight: 400;">Who May Be Affected?</h2>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">You may benefit from this decision if:</p>

<ul style="font-weight: 400;">
 	<li>You have a pending U visa petition;</li>
 	<li>You have a pending T visa petition;</li>
 	<li>You have a pending VAWA self-petition;</li>
 	<li>USCIS granted you deferred action based on a pending U or T visa;</li>
 	<li>You are currently detained by ICE while pursuing one of these forms of relief;</li>
 	<li>You have a final order of removal but have requested a stay based on a pending U or T visa application.</li>
</ul>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Every case is different, and eligibility for relief depends on your individual circumstances.</p>

<h2 style="font-weight: 400;">What Should You Do If You Are Detained or Facing Removal?</h2>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">If you or a loved one has a pending U visa, T visa, or VAWA case and is currently detained by ICE or facing deportation, it is critical to speak with an experienced immigration attorney immediately.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">These cases often involve complex legal issues, emergency filings, bond requests, motions before the immigration court, federal habeas corpus litigation, and negotiations with ICE.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">The law is rapidly evolving, and acting quickly can make a significant difference.</p>

<h3 style="font-weight: 400;">Contact Zambrano Law Today</h3>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">At Zambrano Law, we fight for immigrants in detention, individuals facing deportation, and victims seeking protection through U visas, T visas, and VAWA petitions.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Our firm has extensive experience handling removal defense, bond hearings, federal habeas corpus litigation, and complex immigration matters throughout the United States.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">If you or a family member has a pending U visa, T visa, or VAWA case and is facing detention or removal, contact Zambrano Law immediately.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;"> Call us today at [nap_phone id="LOCAL-CT-NUMBER-1"]</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;"> Zambrano Law
1995 N Park Place, Suite 360
Atlanta, Georgia 30339</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Do not wait until it is too late. Early intervention can make all the difference in protecting your rights and keeping families together.</p>]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>On Behalf of Zambrano Law</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Habeas corpus protects anyone in the U.S., including non-citizens]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.zambranolaw.com/blog/2026/05/habeas-corpus-protects-anyone-in-the-u-s-including-non-citizens/" />
            <id>https://www.zambranolaw.com/?p=51743</id>
            <updated>2026-05-16T20:12:52Z</updated>
            <published>2026-05-16T20:12:52Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Immigrants in the United States are often uncertain about their rights. They may assume that key protections, such as important rules established in the Bill of Rights, only apply to citizens and lawful permanent residents who have green cards. Those facing immigration enforcement actions could end up detained in federal facilities for weeks or months while waiting for a formal…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.zambranolaw.com/blog/2026/05/habeas-corpus-protects-anyone-in-the-u-s-including-non-citizens/"><![CDATA[Immigrants in the United States are often uncertain about their rights. They may assume that key protections, such as important rules established in the Bill of Rights, only apply to citizens and lawful permanent residents who have green cards.

Those facing immigration enforcement actions could end up detained in federal facilities for weeks or months while waiting for a formal hearing in the immigration courts. The current backlog of pending cases leaves people facing an indefinite timeline after local law enforcement professionals or federal employees from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) take them into custody.

People currently in federal custody or family members of those taken into custody may need assistance submitting a writ of habeas corpus to challenge indefinite detention.
<h2>Immigrants can challenge unlawful detention</h2>
Contrary to what many people believe, constitutional rights protect everyone physically present in the United States, regardless of their immigration status or compliance with the law. For those facing immigration controversies, the possibility of detention in a federal facility can be frightening.

One of the key rights that the Constitution establishes <a href="https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/blog/what-is-habeas-corpus-and-why-is-it-important-heres-what-dhs-secretary-kristi-noem-got-wrong/" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">is habeas corpus</a>, which is the right to ask a judge to review one’s imprisonment. A writ of habeas corpus can lead to a hearing that may help an immigrant avoid or end unlawful detention.

Especially in scenarios where people detained or facing removal from the United States have already initiated reasonable and lawful attempts to adjust their status, obtain a visa or secure protected status, possibly through asylum petitions, their detention in a federal immigration facility may be a violation of their rights.

When an immigration attorney submits a writ of habeas corpus to the courts, a judge reviews the individual's situation and determines if their detention is legal. With proper legal support, immigrants may be able to regain their freedom while they continue to pursue lawful immigration opportunities.

Immigrants taken into federal custody or arrested by local authorities and at risk of a transfer of custody may worry about the impact of indefinite detention on their health, families and immigration status. Challenging the legality of the detention is one way for immigrants to assert their legal rights. The help of an immigration attorney familiar with <a href="https://www.zambranolaw.com/immigration/federal-litigation/" data-wpel-link="internal">federal litigation</a> can be invaluable for those facing long-term detention.]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>by Shirley  Zambrano</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[USCIS Issues New Policy Restricting Deferred Action: Why Consulting an Immigration Attorney Matters More Than Ever]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.zambranolaw.com/blog/2026/05/uscis-issues-new-policy-restricting-deferred-action-why-consulting-an-immigration-attorney-matters-more-than-ever/" />
            <id>https://www.zambranolaw.com/?p=51742</id>
            <updated>2026-05-15T19:47:20Z</updated>
            <published>2026-05-15T19:47:20Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[On May 8, 2026, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) issued a major policy update regarding deferred action, making it clear that this form of immigration relief will now be treated as an “extraordinary” exercise of prosecutorial discretion and reviewed under a much stricter standard. This policy change could have serious consequences for immigrants seeking humanitarian relief, deferred action connected to pending…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.zambranolaw.com/blog/2026/05/uscis-issues-new-policy-restricting-deferred-action-why-consulting-an-immigration-attorney-matters-more-than-ever/"><![CDATA[<p style="font-weight: 400;">On May 8, 2026, <a href="https://protect.checkpoint.com/v2/r01/___https://www.uscis.gov?utm_source=chatgpt.com___.YzJ1OndlYm1kOmM6Zzo1ZjIwMGU4NGM2MGUyMzgwYmM3MDBmYzBkZDA2M2EwODo3OjZiZGI6NWQwMjc5OTY0MzYxYThlNzQ3Y2NiZDg4ZjRkNTIwMmU4N2NhZjU4ODIwZGU4YmUzODY3OWI2MjU2MmFiMjYxNjpoOlQ6Rg" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://protect.checkpoint.com/v2/r01/___https://www.uscis.gov?utm_source%3Dchatgpt.com___.YzJ1OndlYm1kOmM6Zzo1ZjIwMGU4NGM2MGUyMzgwYmM3MDBmYzBkZDA2M2EwODo3OjZiZGI6NWQwMjc5OTY0MzYxYThlNzQ3Y2NiZDg4ZjRkNTIwMmU4N2NhZjU4ODIwZGU4YmUzODY3OWI2MjU2MmFiMjYxNjpoOlQ6Rg&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1778939136507000&amp;usg=AOvVaw2HgtJanQF2mK57zp5cbmN2" data-wpel-link="external">U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)</a> issued a major policy update regarding deferred action, making it clear that this form of immigration relief will now be treated as an “extraordinary” exercise of prosecutorial discretion and reviewed under a much stricter standard.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">This policy change could have serious consequences for immigrants seeking humanitarian relief, deferred action connected to pending applications, or other discretionary immigration benefits.</p>

<h2 style="font-weight: 400;">What Is Deferred Action?</h2>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Deferred action is a temporary decision by the government not to pursue deportation against a person for a certain period of time. It does not provide lawful status, but it can sometimes allow a person to remain in the United States temporarily and, in some cases, apply for work authorization.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Historically, deferred action has been used in humanitarian situations and in cases where USCIS believed an individual deserved favorable discretion.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">However, USCIS has now made clear that it believes deferred action should be rare and limited.</p>

<h3 style="font-weight: 400;">What Changed?</h3>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">According to the new policy guidance, USCIS states that deferred action:</p>

<ul style="font-weight: 400;">
 	<li>Should only be granted on a strict case-by-case basis;</li>
 	<li>Is considered an extraordinary use of prosecutorial discretion;</li>
 	<li>Should not be granted broadly to categories or groups of immigrants unless specifically required by law or regulation;</li>
 	<li>Requires compelling circumstances beyond ordinary hardship.</li>
</ul>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">USCIS also emphasized that simply having a pending immigration application or experiencing the normal hardship associated with removal is not enough to justify deferred action.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">This means that many immigrants who may have previously expected deferred action while waiting on immigration benefits could now face denials or increased scrutiny.</p>

<h3 style="font-weight: 400;">Why This Matters</h3>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">This policy signals a significant tightening in how USCIS exercises discretion.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Many immigrants unknowingly file applications, requests, or supporting documentation believing they may qualify for deferred action or related protections. Under this new guidance, submitting the wrong request without understanding the legal consequences could expose individuals to unnecessary immigration risks.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">More than ever, immigrants should avoid filing applications or requesting discretionary relief without first consulting with an experienced immigration attorney.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Every immigration case is different. What may appear to be a straightforward request could trigger unintended consequences depending on a person’s immigration history, manner of entry, prior removal orders, criminal history, or pending proceedings.</p>

<h2 style="font-weight: 400;">Consulting an Immigration Attorney Is Critical</h2>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Before submitting any immigration benefit request, it is important to understand:</p>

<ul style="font-weight: 400;">
 	<li>Whether you may qualify for relief;</li>
 	<li>Whether filing could place you at risk of enforcement action;</li>
 	<li>What evidence is necessary to support your case;</li>
 	<li>Whether alternative forms of relief may be available;</li>
 	<li>How recent USCIS policy changes may affect your situation.</li>
</ul>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Immigration law continues to change rapidly, and policies like this one demonstrate how important individualized legal advice has become.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">At Zambrano Law, we carefully evaluate each client’s case to determine the safest and strongest legal strategy possible. Our firm represents individuals and families in complex immigration matters, including removal defense, humanitarian relief, waivers, detention cases, and federal litigation.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">If you or a loved one are considering filing for an immigration benefit or requesting deferred action, call Zambrano Law today at [nap_phone id="LOCAL-CT-NUMBER-1"] to schedule a consultation.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Do not submit immigration applications or requests without first understanding the possible consequences. A mistake in immigration law can have life-changing consequences.</p>]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>On Behalf of Zambrano Law</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[New Eleventh Circuit Decision Expands Bond Eligibility for Immigrants Detained in Georgia, Florida, and Alabama]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.zambranolaw.com/blog/2026/05/new-eleventh-circuit-decision-expands-bond-eligibility-for-immigrants-detained-in-georgia-florida-and-alabama/" />
            <id>https://www.zambranolaw.com/?p=51731</id>
            <updated>2026-05-08T15:15:06Z</updated>
            <published>2026-05-08T15:15:06Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[For months, many immigrants arrested by ICE inside the United States after entering without inspection were routinely denied bond hearings and held in mandatory detention under INA § 235(b). That may now change in the Eleventh Circuit. In a major published decision issued on May 6, 2026, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that immigrants…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.zambranolaw.com/blog/2026/05/new-eleventh-circuit-decision-expands-bond-eligibility-for-immigrants-detained-in-georgia-florida-and-alabama/"><![CDATA[<span style="font-weight: 400;">For months, many immigrants arrested by ICE inside the United States after entering without inspection were routinely denied bond hearings and held in mandatory detention under INA § 235(b). That may now change in the Eleventh Circuit.</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">In a major published decision issued on May 6, 2026, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that immigrants who entered the United States without inspection but were later arrested in the interior of the country are generally entitled to bond hearings under INA § 236(a), rather than mandatory detention under INA § 235(b)(2)(A).</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">This groundbreaking decision applies throughout:</span>
<ul>
 	<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Georgia</span></li>
 	<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Florida</span></li>
 	<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Alabama</span></li>
</ul>
<span style="font-weight: 400;">For families with loved ones detained at facilities such as Stewart Detention Center, this case could significantly impact whether a person has the right to request release on bond while fighting their immigration case.</span>
<h2>What Was the Case About?</h2>
<span style="font-weight: 400;">The case involved two Mexican nationals who entered the United States without inspection years earlier and had been living in the country with their families. Both were arrested by immigration authorities after traffic stops and placed in removal proceedings. ICE detained them without bond, arguing they were subject to mandatory detention under INA § 235(b).</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">The immigrants filed habeas corpus petitions in federal court arguing that they should instead be detained under INA § 236(a), which allows for bond hearings before an immigration judge.</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">The Eleventh Circuit agreed with the immigrants.</span>
<h2>The Court Rejected DHS’s New Interpretation</h2>
<span style="font-weight: 400;">The government argued that anyone who entered the United States without inspection is automatically considered an “applicant for admission” who is still “seeking admission,” even years after entering the country. Under that theory, ICE claimed these individuals must remain detained without bond.</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">The Eleventh Circuit rejected that interpretation. The Court explained that simply being present in the United States without lawful admission does not mean a person is actively “seeking admission” under the immigration statute.</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">The Court emphasized that the immigrants in this case were not arriving at the border asking to enter the country. Instead, they had already been living inside the United States for years when ICE arrested them following traffic stops.</span>
<h2>Why This Decision Matters</h2>
<span style="font-weight: 400;">This decision is extremely important because it restores the possibility of bond hearings for many immigrants detained inside the United States after entering without inspection.</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">Under INA § 236(a), immigrants may request a bond hearing before an immigration judge to argue:</span>
<ul>
 	<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">they are not a danger to the community,</span></li>
 	<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">they are not a flight risk,</span></li>
 	<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">they have family ties,</span></li>
 	<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">they have employment history,</span></li>
 	<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">and they deserve release while their immigration case continues.</span></li>
</ul>
<span style="font-weight: 400;">Without a bond hearing, individuals can remain detained for months or even years while their cases proceed.</span>
<h2>The Court Also Rejected the BIA’s Position</h2>
<span style="font-weight: 400;">The decision directly undermines the Board of Immigration Appeals’ recent decision in Matter of Yajure-Hurtado, which had been used to deny bond hearings to many detained immigrants.</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">Because of that BIA decision, many immigration judges believed they lacked authority to conduct bond hearings for immigrants who entered without inspection. The Eleventh Circuit now makes clear that these individuals generally fall under INA § 236(a), not mandatory detention under INA § 235(b).</span>
<h2>Important Limitations</h2>
<span style="font-weight: 400;">The Court did not say that every detained immigrant must be released. Instead, the Court held only that many immigrants are entitled to a bond hearing where an immigration judge can decide whether release is appropriate.</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">The Court also did not decide whether Congress could change the law in the future to authorize broader mandatory detention.</span>
<h2>What Should Families Do?</h2>
<span style="font-weight: 400;">If your loved one:</span>
<ul>
 	<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">entered the United States without inspection,</span></li>
 	<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">was arrested inside the United States rather than at the border,</span></li>
 	<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">does not have a final removal order,</span></li>
 	<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">and has been denied bond based on INA § 235(b),</span></li>
</ul>
<span style="font-weight: 400;">this new Eleventh Circuit decision may provide a pathway to request a bond hearing or challenge the detention in federal court.</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">Every case is different, and some individuals may still be subject to mandatory detention based on criminal convictions or other factors. However, this decision creates powerful new legal arguments for detained immigrants throughout Georgia, Florida, and Alabama.</span>
<h2>Contact Zambrano Law</h2>
<span style="font-weight: 400;">At Zambrano Law, we regularly represent immigrants in detention and federal habeas corpus litigation. Our firm fights for bond hearings, release from detention, and protection of our clients’ constitutional rights.</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">If your loved one is detained and may qualify for a bond hearing under this new Eleventh Circuit decision, <a href="/contact/" data-wpel-link="internal">contact our office</a> today to schedule a consultation.</span>

&nbsp;]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>On Behalf of Zambrano Law</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Immigration bonds during the green card process]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.zambranolaw.com/blog/2026/04/immigration-bonds-during-the-green-card-process/" />
            <id>https://www.zambranolaw.com/?p=51729</id>
            <updated>2026-04-30T20:54:42Z</updated>
            <published>2026-04-29T14:22:46Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Immigration detention isn’t something that most people expect. It usually happens without warning, and it can happen even if someone is pursuing a green card or another form of legal status in the United States. Once a person is in custody, their primary question usually centers around whether they must remain in custody during the legal process.  For some, an…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.zambranolaw.com/blog/2026/04/immigration-bonds-during-the-green-card-process/"><![CDATA[<span style="font-weight: 400;">Immigration detention isn’t something that most people expect. It usually happens without warning, and it can happen even if someone is pursuing a green card or another form of legal status in the United States. Once a person is in custody, their primary question usually centers around whether they must remain in custody during the legal process. </span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">For some, an </span><a href="https://www.ice.gov/detain/detention-management/bonds" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-wpel-link="external"><span style="font-weight: 400;">immigration bond</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> is a way to secure a release while the case moves forward. This allows the person to return to their normal life and spend time with their loved ones. Many people prefer to obtain a bond because of how lengthy the court process can be in these cases.</span>
<h2><span style="font-weight: 400;">What is an immigration bond?</span></h2>
<span style="font-weight: 400;">An immigration bond is a financial guarantee that the individual will attend their hearings and comply with court orders. This doesn’t affect the outcome of the case, but it can allow the person to remain free while they’re working through the process. </span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">A bond, which is required to be </span><a href="https://www.theadvocatesforhumanrights.org/Res/Understanding%20Immigration%20Bonds-English.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-wpel-link="external"><span style="font-weight: 400;">at least $1,500</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">, is set by Immigration and Customs Enforcement if the individual is eligible. If that doesn’t happen or if the bond amount is too high, the person can request a hearing before an immigration judge to reconsider the bond decision. The judge will consider various factors, such as flight risk, family ties and employment history. They will also try to determine if the person is a danger to society. </span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">There are different types of immigration bonds, each of which applies to specific situations. For example, a delivery bond allows a person to be released as long as they attend their court hearings. A voluntary departure bond is issued if a person agrees to leave the country within a specified period. </span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">Failing to meet any condition that was included when the bond was issued can mean forfeiting the bond. The process of </span><a href="https://www.zambranolaw.com/immigration/immigration-bonds/" data-wpel-link="internal"><span style="font-weight: 400;">obtaining a bond</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> is often complex and time-sensitive. Working with someone familiar with these matters is beneficial since they can assist with determining how to proceed at each step. </span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">If you have family or a loved one that has been detained, do not hesitate to contact our firm for assistance. Call [nap_phone id="LOCAL-CT-NUMBER-1"] or <a href="/contact/" data-wpel-link="internal">email us</a> to speak with our attorneys.</span>

&nbsp;

&nbsp;]]></content>
						        </entry>
	</feed>